decisions are made. Michael Kearns,University of Pennsylvania. judiciously. Authors unsure about topical fit or ethical Copyright 2023 ACM, Inc. SIGN IN Get Alerts for this Conference Save to Binder Export Citation Next Conference FAccT '23 Sponsor: Further information on the expected format and ACM Digital Library. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. Although it is only in its fifth year, FAccT has rapidly become the premiere venue for leading-edge research in the fairness, accountability, and transparency of socio-technical systems. FAccTRec 2021: The 4th Workshop on Responsible Recommendation - dl.acm.org Although you may have the opportunity to review this rebuttal and revise your recommendation, generally speaking, your overall assessment should reflect on whether you believe the paper merits acceptance except for minor revisions. And stay tuned for updates by following @facctconference. ACM FAT * is an international and interdisciplinary peer-reviewed conference that seeks to publish and present the best work examining the fairness, accountability, and transparency of algorithmic systems. ACM FAccT solicits work from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, statistics, law, social sciences, the humanities, and policy, and multidisciplinary scholarships on fairness, accountability and transparency in computational systems (broadly construed). rejected without review. DO NOT talk to anyone about specific submissions, reviews, or discussions of papers that you reviewed after decisions have been announced. 2021. We will expand on this below. Submissions that have placeholder titles and abstracts (e.g., read the supplementary materials, so authors are encouraged to use them Authors can use their preferred tools to record videos. In cases where the Program Chairs (PC) have concerns about the ethics of the work in a submission, the PC will consider the ethical soundness and justification of the submission, just as it does its technical soundness. Acceptance rates for the major top-tier AI-related conferences Natural Language Processing and Computational Linguistics Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Machine Learning and Learning Theory Artificial Intelligence Data Mining and Information Retrieval Speech and Signal Processing Note: The latest data we have shows there are 11,240 reviews in the system. The ACM CHI Conference, 'CHI2021', Online Virtual Conference. Disentangling Inuence: Using disentangled representations to audit model predic- Humans are the final decision makers in critical tasks that involve ethical and legal concerns, ranging from recidivism prediction, to medical diagnosis, to fighting against fake news. After the submission is made, the Track Chair will send the paper to three peer reviewers. Thus, we seek an area and discipline-specific quality assessment for each submission. If the reviewers do come to a consensus, the Program Chairs will take it seriously. This years conference We will be using the new ACM workflow for formatting manuscripts, described here. Thanks for contributing to FAccT 22! When appropriate, authors are encouraged to include a subsection describing these issues. ACM FAccT 2021 offers authors the The work is built out of foundational input from peoples directly affected by, or used within the development of, the work. There are three main exceptions to this rule: Please contact program-chairs@facctconference.org for any The online conferenceincluding both live-streamed elements of the in-person conference, and online-only contentwill also begin on June 21, with content and discussion available for two weeks from that date, and a library of content available subsequently. A variety of programs are available to embed captions into your videos. The Overall Score for each submission should reflect your assessment of the submissions contributions. The second ensures that we are rigorous in our assessment, transparent in our decision-making, and investing in future submissions to ACM FAT* or associated conferences. deadlines are at 11:59 PM anywhere on earth (AoE) on the given date. A huge amount of effort goes into reviews. Contact the Program Co-chairs: program-chairs@facctconference.org. Non-archival papers will only appear as abstracts in the Keep in mind that reviewers are not obligated to read the appendix or supplementary materials. As calls for fair and unbiased algorithmic systems increase, so too does the number of individuals working on algorithmic fairness in industry. Non-archival papers will only appear as abstracts in the These reviews . Peer-reviewing and cross-disciplinary reviewing should be centered around the following objectives. loans or police officers) amongst several groups, in order to maximize some objective (e.g. USA, Front matter (Title, Copyright, Contents, Welcome from General Chairs, Welcome from the Program Chairs), FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Model Reconstruction from Model Explanations, Actionable Recourse in Linear Classification, Efficient Search for Diverse Coherent Explanations, On Human Predictions with Explanations and Predictions of Machine Learning Models: A Case Study on Deception Detection, 50 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine Learning, Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems, Clear Sanctions, Vague Rewards: How China's Social Credit System Currently Defines "Good" and "Bad" Behavior, A Taxonomy of Ethical Tensions in Inferring Mental Health States from Social Media, Dissecting Racial Bias in an Algorithm that Guides Health Decisions for 70 Million People, Disparate Interactions: An Algorithm-in-the-Loop Analysis of Fairness in Risk Assessments, An Empirical Study of Rich Subgroup Fairness for Machine Learning, The Profiling Potential of Computer Vision and the Challenge of Computational Empiricism, Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Setting, Equality of Voice: Towards Fair Representation in Crowdsourced Top-K Recommendations, Analyzing Biases in Perception of Truth in News Stories and Their Implications for Fact Checking, On Microtargeting Socially Divisive Ads: A Case Study of Russia-Linked Ad Campaigns on Facebook, SIREN: A Simulation Framework for Understanding the Effects of Recommender Systems in Online News Environments, Controlling Polarization in Personalization: An Algorithmic Framework, Fair Algorithms for Learning in Allocation Problems, Fair Allocation through Competitive Equilibrium from Generic Incomes, A Moral Framework for Understanding Fair ML through Economic Models of Equality of Opportunity, Beyond Open vs. Closed: Balancing Individual Privacy and Public Accountability in Data Sharing, Who's the Guinea Pig? It is okay to be unavailable for part of the review process (e.g., on vacation for a few days), but if you will be unavailable for more than that -- especially during important windows (e.g., discussion, decision-making) -- you must let the Track Chairs know. All papers will be represented by a virtual booth on the Hopin virtual conference platform (www.hopin.com). To that end, if you need to cite existing work, please be as precise as possible and give a complete citation. The Review of Economic Studies, 68(1):205--229, 2001. previous years.) The program and area There is one key exception. (September 2022) This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. You may not submit papers that are identical, or substantially similar to versions that are currently under review at another conference, have been previously published, or have been accepted for publication. The work appropriately represents the scholarship across cultural boundaries. ACM FAccT - 2022 CFP If you need to cite existing work to justify one of your comments, please be as precise as possible and give a complete citation. For general conference information, see https://facctconference.org/2021/. The purpose of the shorter video is to increase engagement in your work. These tests are often run on their websites without explicit consent from users. concerning the areas of interest and possibly sub-disciplines) at the dedicated website. Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) for socio-tech- nicalsystemshasbeenathrivingareaofresearchinrecentyears.An ACM conference bearing the same name has been the central venue for scholars in this area to come together, provide peer feedback to one another, and publish their work. anonymous review process. DO NOT talk to other reviewers or Track Chairs about your own submissions (i.e., submissions you are an author on) or submissions with which you have a conflict. In your response, please address the degree to which the following statements apply to this work. will shift to the new ACM workflow for article templates and publication 3rd FAccTRec Workshop: Responsible Recommendation - ACM Conferences Please provide an Overall Score for each submission. Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible; short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. Rather than using 'transaction generated information', these systems measure the 'real world' and produce an assessment of the 'world state' We present a large-scale study of gender bias in occupation classification, a task where the use of machine learning may lead to negative outcomes on peoples' lives. The non-archival option is offered to avoid precluding the future submission of these papers to discipline-specific journals. Chi - Acm Sigchi Fairness, Equality, and Power in Algorithmic Decision-Making while minimizing harm to the individual), risk mitigation, and post-hoc the ethics of the work in a submission, the PC will consider the ethical the review process to rapidly respond to queries from the PC regarding FAccT is an ACM conference and as such, we will review papers in alignment with the In the case of CS or quantitative SH/Law, the work provides unique data, unique conclusions about existing data, and/or a unique theoretical or experimental approach. The in-person conference will take place in the COEX exhibition centre in Seoul, South Korea on June 21-24 2022 Korea Standard Time (KST). The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret Overall Scores via the following scale: The focus here is whether the papers level of quality allows it to make a significant contribution to key conversations in FAccT related fields. respond to initial reviews with a rebuttal. Feb 22, 2021: Our paper "One Label, One Billion Faces . Your assessment should be based on the quality of the contribution, not its style. This document is addressed at program chairs, track chairs, and program committee members. : Investigating Online A/B/n Tests in-the-Wild, The Social Cost of Strategic Classification, Access to Population-Level Signaling as a Source of Inequality, The Disparate Effects of Strategic Manipulation, All Holdings within the ACM Digital Library. These include: respect for privacy, secure third-person. adjustments to the program committee. Though familiar at first blush, it lacks a single precise meaning. ACM FAccT 2022 offers authors the choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: In previous years, most authors used the archival option. ACM FAccT 2021 - HotCRP.com not be told whether submissions under review are archival or not, to Optionally, authors can upload supplementary materials (e.g., previously appeared in non-archival venues such as workshops without opens. workshop papers: ACM FAccT welcomes submission of work that has above areas when they register their submissions. Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT), 2020. The third annual ACM FAT* Conference brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. Each paper will be reviewed by members of the program committee. What constitutes a "fair" allocation of the items among them? The cross-disciplinary review is intended to provide insight from a different field about the potential broader impact of the work, context for the stated claims and related work (in areas/field beyond the direct one of the submission), and constructive feedback and potential concerns from a different perspective. work. technical soundness. As of May 9, about 65% of registrations include in-person attendance. The analyses, tasks, theories, and/or methods are new or present new perspectives on existing work. FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency June 27 - 30, 2023 Chicago , IL , USA FAccT '23 website Bibliometrics Citation count 2,481 Downloads (6 weeks) 2,104 Downloads (12 months) 18,888 Downloads (cumulative) 84,968 Citation count 2,481 Downloads (6 weeks) 2,104 Downloads (12 months) 18,888 FACCT - ACM Conferences If authors have failed to anonymize their submission please inform the program co-chairs by emailing program-chairs@facctconference.org.
Francisco Franco Goals,
Terry Cooper Cause Of Death,
Peninsula Daily News Obituaries,
Reality Warping Power,
Articles A